Legal Opinion

Simpson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided December 13, 2001No. 06-01-00045-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEN Z. GRANT, Justice.

Jeremie Simpson appeals his convictions for aggravated robbery and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. Simpson filed a motion to suppress a statement he made to police, which the trial court overruled after a hearing. He then pleaded guilty to the offenses before a jury. After hearing evidence, the jury assessed his punishment at twenty years’ imprisonment for the aggravated robbery offense and two years’ imprisonment for the unauthorized use of a motor vehicle offense. The sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

On appeal, Simpson contends the trial court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Keller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  2. Brendan Xavier Douglas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2016
  3. Burton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
  4. Douglas Wayne Harris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
  5. Douglas Wayne Harris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API