Legal Opinion

Hinson v. Hinson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 14, 1973No. 7310DC247PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Did the trial court err in concluding that the judgment entered by Judge Copeland on 18 March 1968 was a final judgment? We answer in the negative.

G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(a) provides: “A judgment is either interlocutory or the final determination of the rights of the parties.” This definition of judgment was formerly contained in G.S. 1-208. An interlocutory judgment is one made during the pendency of an action, which does not dispose of the case, but leaves it for further action by the trial court in order to settle and determine the entire controversy; a final judgment is one which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. United States v. LefflerSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  3. Bunker v. Bunker.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reid v. MidgettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Poore v. Swan Quarter Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Farm Credit Bank of Columbia v. Van DorpCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. FIRST GASTON BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA v. City of HickoryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Hamilton v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API