Legal Opinion

Reininger v. Prickett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1943No. 30858PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, V. C. J.

Plaintiff below appeals from a judgment rendered against her on sustaining defendant’s demurrer to her evidence in an action for slander.

Plaintiff pleaded and proved sufficient facts to establish the ordinary action for slander where malice may be presumed from the slanderous utterances. 12 O. S. 1941 § 303. This is not seriously denied.

But the main controversy here concerns the element of malice, and the burden of proof with respect thereto.

Defendant took the position that the alleged slanderous communications attributed to her were privileged, of quali-fiedly privileged, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. German-American Ins. Co. v. HuntleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Harris v. RichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trautwein v. HarbourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Thornton v. Holdenville General HospitalCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Wright v. HaasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Benson v. Griffin Television, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Tatum v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API