Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Calvin Barton v. House of Raeford Farms, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 11, 2014No. 12-1943, 12-1945, 12-1946Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKing, Circuit Judge

I respectfully disagree with the panel majority’s decision except its affirmance of the judgments in favor of plaintiffs Billy Harris and Lisa Jamison on their workers’ compensation retaliation claims. Indeed, I would fully affirm the district court, which carefully and capably adjudicated all of the retaliation and unpaid wages claims asserted herein.

With respect to the unpaid wages claims, the district court properly allowed a jury trial on whether defendant Columbia Farms violated the South Carolina Payment of Wages Act by, inter alia, providing written notice to employees that they would…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Barron v. Labor Finders of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Carolina Alliance for Fair Employment v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing, & RegulationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Hinton v. Designer Ensembles, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API