Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Minson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1990No. TC 87-CV-0055-15; CA A48856; SC S36286PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

This is a civil action for property damages. The issue is whether defendant Minson is entitled to attorney fees under ORS 20.080 as the prevailing party on a counterclaim. The circuit court denied his motion for attorney fees, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Bennett v. Minson, 96 Or App 689, 773 P2d 813 (1989). We reverse.

Plaintiff Bennett’s truck collided with a truck owned by defendant. Each party initiated a separate district court action for damages against the other. Plaintiff then transferred his action to the circuit court. Defendant counterclaimed in that court, pleading damages of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colby v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Shelton v. LOWELLOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Landers v. East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Bivvins v. UngerOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Bennett v. MinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Halperin v. PittsOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Newell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Taylor v. McCollomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Bunnell v. BernauCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Huntley v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API