Legal Opinion · Dissent

Postnieks v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 10, 2007No. A07A0270Published

1DissentBernes, Judge

Because the evidence does not establish as a matter of law that the trustees dedicated the curb cut and driveway to public use, I respectfully dissent. “To prove a dedication of land to public use, there must be an offer, either express or implied, by the owner of the land and an acceptance, either express or implied, by the appropriate public authorities or by the general public.” Smith v. State, 248 Ga. 154, 158 (2) (282 SE2d 76) (1981). See OCGA§ 44-5-230. In this case, the evidence is insufficient to establish either an express or implied offer of dedication.

The majority opines that an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. MDC BLACKSHEAR, LLC v. LittellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Lines v. State of Ga.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Chatham Motorcycle Club, Inc. v. BlountSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  4. Blank v. Park Lane Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  5. Shapiro Bros., Inc. v. Jones-Festus Properties, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API