Legal Opinion

Millikan v. American Spectrum Real Estate Services California, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 2004No. G031944PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

Defendant contends that when a landlord sells leased property after the tenant has abandoned the lease, the landlord may not recover from the tenant expenses incurred in selling the property. We conclude the law does not impose that blanket prohibition. Instead, the landlord’s entitlement to recover selling expenses from a breaching tenant depends upon the evidence adduced in a particular case, as is true with respect to other expenses incurred by the landlord in mitigating damages, and as is true generally when calculating damages from breach of contract. In this case,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Aceves v. Regal Pale Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Brandon & Tibbs v. George Kevorkian Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Richard v. BroussardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  5. First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. L. Wiemann Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Powerhouse Motorsports Group, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Ai Ping Lu v. GrewalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. First National Mortgage Co. v. Federal Realty Investment TrustDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
  4. BLT Burger DC, LLC v. Norvin 1301 CT, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. M&M Media Group v. ACE Outdoor Advertising CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API