Legal Opinion

Special Commodity Group on Non-Rubber Footwear v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 3, 1985No. Court 85-4-00579PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CARMAN, Judge.

Before the Court is a motion to intervene in an action by Special Commodity Group on Non-Rubber Footwear from Brazil (plaintiff) challenging the Commerce Department’s final determination imposing a countervailing duty on rubber footwear from Brazil. Plaintiff brought the action under section 516A of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a. Proposed inter-venor is Footwear Industries of America, Inc. (FIA), seeking to intervene on the side of defendant. The issue presented is whether a trade association may intervene in a section 516A action when it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
  2. American Grape Growers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Citrosuco Paulista, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  2. Ad Hoc Utilities Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  3. Ad Hoc Utilities Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  4. Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API