Special Commodity Group on Non-Rubber Footwear v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CARMAN, Judge.
Before the Court is a motion to intervene in an action by Special Commodity Group on Non-Rubber Footwear from Brazil (plaintiff) challenging the Commerce Department’s final determination imposing a countervailing duty on rubber footwear from Brazil. Plaintiff brought the action under section 516A of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a. Proposed inter-venor is Footwear Industries of America, Inc. (FIA), seeking to intervene on the side of defendant. The issue presented is whether a trade association may intervene in a section 516A action when it…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
- American Grape Growers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Citrosuco Paulista, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Ad Hoc Utilities Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Ad Hoc Utilities Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992