Legal Opinion
Riphenburg v. United States
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 28, 1986No. M84-157 CA2PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION RE MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RE MOTION TO AMEND
HILLMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant United States of America’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, and plaintiff’s motion to amend. For the reasons stated below, the motion to amend is denied and the motion for summary judgment is granted.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Michael Riphenburg is a Technical Sergeant (TSgt.) on active duty in the United States Air Force (USAF), working as a maintenance specialist. He has been on active duty for over 16 years.
Prior to April 23,1981,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- LeDuc v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Work v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lamb v. Pralex Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2004