Legal Opinion

State v. Proell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2007No. 20060222PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jerald V. Proell appeals from the criminal judgment and the district court’s decision denying the motion to suppress evidence seized during his arrest under a federal arrest warrant. The district court found probable cause supported the original search warrants leading to the issuance of the federal arrest warrant. Proell contends the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because probable cause did not exist to support the original search warrants and therefore evidence obtained from the search incident to arrest was inadmissible. We affirm…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. GreggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. HageNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AlbaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. TrevinoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Discover Bank v. Bolinske, Sr.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Interest of D.O.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. ScholesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API