Trickey v. Hunter
California Court of Appeal
1ConcurrenceDooling, J.
I concur. I feel it advisable, however, to comment on an apparent illogicality in the law which has been created by the eases of Medeiros v. Soares, 17 Cal. App.2d 176 [61 P.2d 501]; Pattisson v. Cavanagh, 18 Cal. App.2d 123 [63 P.2d 868, 64 P.2d 945]; and Gulley v. Daggett, 80 Cal.App.2d 784 [182 P.2d 613], in all of which it *744was held that in collisions at intersections of signposted through highways it is proper to instruct on both sections 550 and 552 (formerly Veh. Code, § 131(a) and 131(c)). This rule has the express sanction of the Supreme Court as noted in Gulley v. Daggett, supra, p.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pattisson v. CavanaghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Elmore v. County of LassenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Medeiros v. SoaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Gulley v. DaggettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947