Legal Opinion

In re Bruce R.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 26, 1994No. 12662PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

The respondent mother appeals from the order of the trial court terminating the parental rights of the petitioner father. On appeal, the respondent claims that the trial court improperly (1) utilized the termination procedure provided for in General Statutes § 45a-715 et seq. to terminate the parental rights of the petitioner, (2) found that termination of the peti*178tioner’s parental rights was in the best interests of the children, (3) refused to order the petitioner to file a financial affidavit pursuant to Practice Book § 463, and (4) sustained the petitioner’s objection to the respondent’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Valante v. ValanteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. In re Theresa S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Holmes v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. Dime Savings Bank v. CornagliaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Bruce R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Wilkes v. WilkesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. In re Bruce R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. In Interest of Jessica M., (Dec. 16, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API