Coffin v. Eisiminger
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mahaska District Court — Hon. J. K. Johnson, Judge. Plaintiff brought an action against the ward of defendant, aided by attachment. The original notice was served by publication, the defendant was garnished, and judgment was rendered for the sum of $107.55 and costs against the attached property.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Mahaska District Court — Hon. J. K. Johnson, Judge. Plaintiff brought an action against the ward of defendant, aided by attachment. The original notice was served by publication, the defendant was garnished, and judgment was rendered for the sum of $107.55 and costs against the attached property. At the same time judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff and against the garnishee for the same amount, the ward having been duly served with notice of the garnishment proceedings. The plaintiff afterwards filed an application in probate for an order requiring defendant to pay the…
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
— I. The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the following reasons: (1) Because no appeal lies from the order made in this cause; (2) because, the facts being conceded, the order made does not affect any substantial right of the appellant; (3) because the rights of appellant are in no way affected by said order.” This is a proceeding to enforce the payment of a sum of money which has been adjudged to be due in an action brought for that purpose. The order was a final one, and required appellant to pay over *32a given sum of money within a time fixed in the order. We think this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bates v. DunhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sturgis v. SturgisOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Kirk v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Hawk v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Guardianship of Buck v. ThornleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Shumaker v. BohrofenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.