Legal Opinion

HOWELL-ROBINSON v. Albert

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 20, 2008No. Civil Action 05-1660 (RWR)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.

Debtor Diane Howell-Robinson appeals the bankruptcy court’s decision that $58,000 in proceeds from a personal injury settlement were not exempt from inclusion in a bankruptcy estate under District of Columbia Code § 15-501(a)(ll)(D). Howell-Robinson claims that personal injury proceeds are a valid exemption under District of Columbia law. Marc Albert, the trustee, asserts that no such exemption exists. Because Howell-Robinson has not shown that the statute’s text or legislative history creates an exemption, the bankruptcy court’s judgment…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. United States v. Rayful Edmond, IIICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  5. Johnson v. McDow (In Re Johnson)District Court, District of Columbia · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Defense of Animals v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API