Legal Opinion
Vittorio v. U-Haul Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 24, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants U-Haul Company, U-Haul Company of New York, Inc., and U-Haul International appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Sproat, J.), dated June 1, 2007, as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The appellants failed to make a prima facie showing that they neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition (see Hudlin v…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kucera v. Waldbaums SupermarketsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Pappalardo v. Long Island Rail RoadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Reeves v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Hudlin v. DeliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fotiou v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Montemarano v. Atlantic Express Transportation Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Delishi v. Property Owner USA LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2011
- Kanic Realty Associates, Inc. v. Suffolk County Water AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Kanic Realty Associates, Inc. v. Suffolk County Water AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015