State v. Flowers
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
The questions presented by this appeal are whether the trial court erred in: (1) refusing to dismiss rape charges against both defendants on the ground that the Yadkin County Grand Jury *211had no jurisdiction to indict for rape; (2) admitting the prosecuting witness’s in-court identification of Waugh; (3) admitting self-incriminating testimony given by Waugh at a prior continuance hearing for Flowers; (4) refusing to dismiss kidnapping charges against Flowers on the ground of insufficiency of evidence, and (5) admitting certain evidence and instructing the jury. We hold that the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dickson v. Rucho, 366 NC 332Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. PigottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.