Legal Opinion

Ochoa v. Workman

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 18, 2012No. 10-6088PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 321, 122 S.Ct. 2242,153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment precludes the execution of mentally retarded criminals. Relying on Atkins, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals (“OCCA”) granted George Ochoa, a convicted murderer under sentence of death, a post-conviction jury trial to determine whether he was mentally retarded. The jury found Ochoa failed to meet his burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, he was mentally retarded. The OCCA affirmed. Ochoa v. State, 136 P.3d…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hooks v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Case v. HatchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. PickardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. Leatherwood v. AllbaughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  5. Andre Williams v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API