Legal Opinion

Summerhill v. Darrow

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1900No. 913PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District, in an appeal from Bowie County. See Darrow v. Summerhill, 93 Texas, 92, where certified questions in this case were decided.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

This case was before us upon certified questions which embraced all of the propositions presented in the plaintiffs’ petition for writ of error, except those hereinafter discussed. We deem it unnecessary to review the questions heretofore determined, but refer to our former opinion, which will be found in Darrow v. Summerhill, 93 Texas, 92.

The petition for writ of error was granted upon the ground that the Court of Civil Appeals erred in finding that the claim of Tempe Darrow was not barred by the statute of limitations, which involves these questions: (1) Were the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Primm v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Darrow v. SummerhillTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Collins v. GranthamIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gorham v. SettegastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  2. Teagarden v. PattenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Eckert v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Conyer v. BurckhalterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Wren v. HowlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API