Legal Opinion

Conklin v. School City

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1919No. 9,987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Elkhart Superior Court; James L. Harman, Judge. Action by the school city of South Bend against Frank G. Conklin and wife. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, J.

The essential facts of this case, as disclosed by the record, are as follows: In April, 1911, the appellant Frank G. Conklin was the owner of a certain tract of real estate - situated in the city of South Bend, the title to which appellee desired to .acquire for .school purposes and, the parties failing to agree, suit was brought by appellee against Frank G. Conklin and Jean I. Conklin, his wife, the appellants, to appropriate the land to said purpose. Such proceedings were thereafter had in said cause, the venue having been changed to the Laporte Circuit Court, that the appellant Frank G.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weiss v. GuerineauIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Duncan v. GaineyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Chaplin v. SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. v. WinstonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Van Baelen v. EQUITABLE SECURITY TRUST COMPANYSuperior Court of Delaware · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API