HABER v. AGHARKAR

**NOT FOR PUBLICATION** UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DAVID MARTIN HABER, Civil Action No.: 18-16121 (CCC) Plaintiff, OPINION v. NIKHIL S. AGHARKAR, ESQ., et al., Defendants. CECCHI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on defendants Nikhil S. Agharkar’s (“Agharkar”) and Bendit Weinstock, P.A.’s (“Bendit Weinstock,” together with Agharkar, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss the pro se plaintiff’s amended complaint (the “Motion”). ECF No. 21. For the reasons set forth below, the amended complaint fails to state a claim and must be…