Legal Opinion
State v. Hooker
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 30, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Phillips Circuit Court. Hance N. Hutton, Judge. The demurrer should have been overruled. 66 Ark. 65.
1Opinion of the CourtBattue, J.
Omitting the caption, the indictment in this case is as follows:
“The grand jury of Phillips county, in the name and by the authority of the state of Arkansas, accuse Allen Hooker and Bob Robinson of the crime of a misdemeanor, committed as follows, towit: The said Allen Hooker and Bob Robinson, in the county and state aforesaid, on the 19th day of November, A. D. 1902, then and there unlawfully and willfully did cut down certain timber, towit, two trees of the value of $6, which said trees were standing and growing upon the lands of P. A. Duke; towit, upon the west half of section 9, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Scales v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Fortenbury v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- State v. PiersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- State v. MoserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
- State v. WittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rowland v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915