Legal Opinion

Rowland v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 28, 1948No. 4483PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

This appeal is from a conviction on an indictment for bribery, wherein it was alleged that the defendant (appellant here), Jay M. Rowland, as city attorney of Hot Springs, received money as bribes, to-wit, $5.0 each month during the years 1945 and 1946 from Otis McCraw, operator of the Southern Club, a gambling establishment; and that said bribes were paid to Rowland with intent to influence his actions and decisions as city attorney pertaining to the ordinance which prohibits gambling. The defendant was indicted under § 3249, Pope’s Digest. Some of our cases…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ballard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Hill v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lowe v. Texas Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Andrews v. LauenerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Campbell v. City of Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  4. Streett v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. In re RowlandDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API