Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Payne v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 22, 2003No. 25719Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Pleicones

I concur in the result, but write separately because, in my opinion, the PCR judge correctly found that attorney Strickler did not impermissibly comment on petitioner’s exercise of his Fifth Amendment privilege to remain silent. He therefore found that petitioner’s counsel was not ineffective in failing to object. I agree with the PCR judge’s analysis, and agree with the majority that we should affirm.

In State v. Green, 269 S.C. 623, 239 S.E.2d 646 (1977), the Court was faced with the claim that the trial court erred in denying appellants’ motion for a severance. At trial, appellants had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carlos Garza De Luna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. United States v. Randy Lamont Patterson AKA Randy Brown, Marcus Wayne Edmundson, Tony Burton, Don Grogans, and Billy Ray BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Allen Scott JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Walter H. McClure and Anthony TafoyaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API