Legal Opinion

Welch v. Bohart

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 3, 1914No. 2958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Caddo County; Prank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by J. C. Bohart against T. J. Welch. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

On September 29, 1910, J. C. Bohart sued T. J. Welch in the district court of Caddo county in ejectment for the northeast quarter of section 36, township 6 north, of range 9 west, of the Indian meridian, in that county, and for a sum certain for rents and profits. Defendant, among other things, pleaded a general denial. He also defended his possession under a prior lease from the School Land Commission of Oklahoma Territory, letting to him for a term of years the land sued for, and his right to re-lease the land. To maintain the issues on his part plaintiff introduced in evidence a lease to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. James v. Germania Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Wallace v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Gonzales v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Ross v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Ross v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brunson v. Carter Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Davis v. CampbellArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Wyodak Chemical Co. v. Board of Land CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Sutherland v. TaintorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API