Legal Opinion

Johnson Freight Lines, Inc. v. Davis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeHaven

Complainant, Johnson Freight Lines, Incorporated, and defendant, Joe Davis, were both engaged in the transportation of freight by track, and both held certificates of convenience and necessity from the Bailroad and Public Utilities Commission of Tennessee. Complainant was authorized to transport freight between Nashville and Chattanooga. Defendant was authorized to transport freight between Nashville and Winchester, and between Chattanooga and Winchester, but was forbidden to transport freight between Chattanooga and Nashville. The two certificates held by defendant were issued in the year…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atlanta Accident Ass'n v. BraggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Tennessee Coach Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Rudco Oil & Gas Co. v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. OrtizCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
  4. Wilson v. Memphis Pub. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  5. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. OrtizCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API