State v. Hill
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Melissa Goodwin, Justice
The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting appellee Will Hill’s motion to suppress. In three points of error, the State argues that the trial court abused its discretion by suppressing the blood test evidence that was obtained in accordance with section 724.0Í2(b) of the Texas Transportation Code, commonly known as the mandatory blood draw' statute. See Tex. Transp. Code § 724.012(b). We will affirm the trial court.
BACKGROUND
Prior to trial, Hill filed a- general motion to suppress. Both sides filed trial briefs, addressing whether the seizure of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.