Legal Opinion

Super v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided May 11, 1959No. 660PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOHN, J.,

We have before us an action in trespass against the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission. The three plaintiffs are Doris Super, Claire Super and Dorothy Super. In their amended complaint, they plead that they are residents of Roslyn, Pa., and New York City, N. Y., respectively. They aver in the amended complaint that on or about October 29, 1956, at about 8:20 p. m., the one plaintiff, Dorothy Super, was operating her automobile in a lawful manner in an easterly direction on the Pennsylvania Turnpike, east of the Willow Grove entrance to said turnpike, and plaintiffs, Claire Super and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scibilia v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Collins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Valley Forge Gardens, Inc. v. James D. Morrissey, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Ewalt v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Coxe v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1964
  3. Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API