Legal Opinion
Canada Coal Co. v. Stiltner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 13, 1989No. Nos. 87-3743, 87-3744 and 87-3972PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Canada Coal Company, Old Republic Companies, United Coal Company, Travel*154ers Insurance Company, Wolf Creek Collieries, Inc., and K. Kiser Coal Company petition this court for review of decisions of the Benefits Review Board. For the following reasons, we dismiss the petitions.
I
Kentucky Revised Statutes Annotated § 342.800 (Baldwin 1985), provides that anyone who files a claim under Kentucky Workers’ Compensation Law for coal workers’ pneumoconiosis or silicosis benefits must also file and pursue in good faith a claim under the federal Black Lung Benefits Act and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richard N. Schuck v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General and United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Callahan v. AlexanderDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- Save Domestic Oil, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Canada Coal Company v. StiltnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Cargill, Inc. v. MSHRCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.