Legal Opinion
In Re Chakos
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided January 3, 1930PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Karalis, a secured creditor of the bankrupt, presents Ms motion for an order directing the trustee to pay to Mm without further delay the sum of $3,000 held by the trustee and heretofore ordered distributed to said Karalis. TMs motion is resisted by W. H. Erawley, an alleged creditor of said Karalis’ assignor, Chakos, who also seeks by cross-motion authority to prosecute a smt in garnishment against the trustee as well as said Karalis.
TMs bankruptcy case has been a source of prolific litigation, various issues having been presented to this court as well as to the Court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Central Trust Co. v. East Tennessee, V. & G. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1894
- Priestly v. Hilliard & TaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
- Central Trust Co. of New York v. Chattanooga, R. & C. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1895
- Grant v. BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
- In re KranichDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1910
3Cited by11 opinions
- BANKERS'MORTG. CO. OF TOPEKA, KAN. v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Bank of Hawaii v. BenchwickDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1966
- Phoenix v. KovacevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Credit Bureau of San Diego, Inc. v. GettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- In re JankauskasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.