Legal Opinion
Crutchfield v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided October 31, 2002No. CIV.A. 3:02CV253PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAYNE, District Judge.
This action arises out of the ongoing efforts of Hanover County (the “County”) to provide capacity to treat and dispose of the forecast increases in wastewater expected to accompany forecast growth in certain areas of the County. Under the circumstances outlined fully in a Memorandum Opinion issued on August 7, 2002 (the “August 7 Opinion”), the County planned, and began construction of, a wastewater treatment project that would impact a small amount of wetlands, and therefore required authorization from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arlington Coalition on Transportation v. John A. Volpe, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- In the Matter of Robert L. Thorp, Esq., Witness-Appellant. United States of America v. Robert L. Thorp, Witness-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- State of North Carolina Roanoke River Basin Association v. City of Virginia BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MicroStrategy, Inc. v. Business Objects, S.A.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- MARTIN v. SEABOLTDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2024
- Orlando v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023