Legal Opinion

Rose v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1979No. Appeal, No. 1341 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Claimant Rose appeals from an adverse decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, affirming determinations of the referee and the Bureau of Employment Security, that claimant had voluntarily left her employment without cause of a necessitous or compelling nature and was therefore ineligible for benefits under Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.1

Claimant was employed by North Penn Convalescent Home at an hourly rate of $2.35. Claimant’s last day of work was November 26, 1975. The following day her husband died, and claimant returned to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Zinman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Rizzitano v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Rettan v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Judd v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Oberholtzer v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Brown v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. J.S. Roberts v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Palmieri v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API