Legal Opinion
Broccardo v. Freeman United Coal Mining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 24, 2004No. 03-3258PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Former miner Joseph Broecardo was denied supplemental pension benefits from Freeman United Coal Mining Company. (“Freeman”). Broecardo and his union, the United Mine Workers of America (“Union”), then sued Freeman alleging that the denial of benefits violated Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, et. seq. (“LMRA”) and Section 502(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et. seq. The district court granted Freeman’s motion for summary judgment regarding the LMRA counts, finding that Broecardo was not employed at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cleveland v. Porca Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Murphy v. Keystone Steel & Wire Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Thomas J. Moriarty v. James F. Svec, Individually, Doing Business as Svec and Sons Funeral Home and Doing Business as West Suburban LiveryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Sarah Robyns v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company and Community Centers of Indianapolis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Saverslak v. Davis-Cleaver Produce Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burmeister v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013