Legal Opinion

Dassinger v. Oden

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 11, 1979No. 1 CA-CIV 4045PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONOFRIO, Judge.

Appellants filed a negligence action against appellees alleging injuries and damages arising out of an arrest situation. The complaint alleged that despite warnings about appellant John Dassinger’s multiple sclerosis Officer Oden handcuffed him behind his back thereby causing physical injury. The controversy below and on appeal is whether appellants complied with the claim requirements of A.R.S. § 12-821. Fulfilling these requirements is a jurisdictional prerequisite to the institution of a negligence action against the State. State v. Stone, 104 Ariz. 339, 452 P.2d 513…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stanley Bialowas, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  2. Estelle E. Caton v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Michael Alan Avril and Gloria Melanie McMullen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. Driggers v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Pritchard v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Mammo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Yollin v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Howland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API