Mary P. v. Illinois State Board of Education
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LEINENWEBER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Michael P. and his parents, brought an action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., alleging that defendants, which include the Illinois State Board of Education, Michael’s school district, administrators, and teachers, wrongfully denied Michael special education services for his speech impairment. Plaintiffs and defendants now both move for summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
Michael is a seven-year-old boy who suffers from a speech impairment due to the presence of small nodules…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- A.J. ex rel. C.L.J. v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Mary P. Ex Rel. Michael P. v. Illinois State Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Hooks v. Clark County School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Aj Ex Rel. Clj v. Board of Educ.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Hooks v. Clark County School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.