Legal Opinion

In re Rohan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 2005Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1997. He maintained an office for the practice of law in New Jersey, where he was admitted in 1996.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended respondent from practice for a period of three months, effective August 10, 2005. The Supreme Court conditioned respondent’s reinstatement on submission of proof of his fitness to practice law as attested to by a mental health professional approved by its Office of Attorney Ethics. The court based its suspension order on a decision of its Disciplinary Review Board which concluded that respondent was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re GendelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re MaffongelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. In re WheatleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API