In re Maffongelli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1981. He maintained an office for the practice of law in New Jersey, where he was admitted to practice in 1969.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended respondent from practice for a period of one year, effective August 1, 2003. That court’s order conditioned respondent’s reinstatement upon submission of proof that he is physically and mentally fit to practice law, and required his practice of law after reinstatement to be under the supervision of a practicing attorney. The court based its order on the conclusion of its Disciplinary Review…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In re DiamondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re RohanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005