Andrew Kaeding v. Karl Auleciems, Susanne Auleciems
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this landlord-tenant dispute regarding forfeiture of security deposits, pro se appellant landlords challenge the district court’s summary judgment that the forfeiture clause in a lease is unenforceable and the district court’s award of attorney fees, costs, and disbursements to respondent tenants. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent-tenants Andrew and Elisa Kaeding leased a house from appellant-landlords Karl and Susanne Auleciems. The house had a basement, a main floor, and a second floor. The lease ran from April 1, 2013, through March 31, 2014, with monthly rent of $2,700,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-SilverwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Metro Office Parks Co. v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kelbro Co. v. Vinny's On the River, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Alberto v. ImamuraSuperior Court of Guam · 2020