Legal Opinion

Andrew Kaeding v. Karl Auleciems, Susanne Auleciems

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 31, 2016No. A16-479PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In this landlord-tenant dispute regarding forfeiture of security deposits, pro se appellant landlords challenge the district court’s summary judgment that the forfeiture clause in a lease is unenforceable and the district court’s award of attorney fees, costs, and disbursements to respondent tenants. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent-tenants Andrew and Elisa Kaeding leased a house from appellant-landlords Karl and Susanne Auleciems. The house had a basement, a main floor, and a second floor. The lease ran from April 1, 2013, through March 31, 2014, with monthly rent of $2,700,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-SilverwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Metro Office Parks Co. v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kelbro Co. v. Vinny's On the River, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Alberto v. ImamuraSuperior Court of Guam · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API