Legal Opinion

Collier v. Cunningham

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 1891No. 234PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The appellant commenced this action *255against the appellee to recover the value of wheat and oats, the property of the appellant, which the complaint alleged had been unlawfully carried away and converted by the appellee.

The appellee’s answer was in two paragraphs: First. General denial. The second set up facts showing that the appellee had leased the lands, upon which the wheat and oats were raised, to one John T. Cunningham for a share of the crops, to be delivered in the bushel after the crops were harvested; that the conditions of said lea’se were that the land was to be farmed in a certain…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Lane v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  3. Indianapolis Manufacturing & Carpenters Union v. Cleveland, C., C., & I. Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. McCaslin v. State ex rel. AuditorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Brown's v. BraggIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hostetler v. EcclesOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. FrankelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Surface v. DorrellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Fruin v. Gorden (In Re Gorden)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1985
  5. Burket v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API