Legal Opinion

St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. United States Fire Ins. Co. of New York

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1933No. 1428—6060PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEDDY, Judge.

Plaintiff in error, the St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Company, sued defendant in error, the United States Fire Insurance Company of New York, to recover indemnity for the loss of certain cotton in the destruction by fire of the compress of the Aransas Compress & Warehouse Company at Harlingen. At the time the cotton was destroyed it was covered by bills of lading theretofore issued by plaintiff in error.

There were two classes of this cotton, one designated as “city cotton,” which originated at Harlingen, and which at the time of the fire was located upon the platform of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arthur v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ClaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. United States Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Morgan v. DibbleTexas Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fletcher L. Yarbrough & Co. v. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Texas & N. O. R. v. J. Kahn & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API