Compubahn, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This case is before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment pursuant to RCFC 56. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants defendant’s motion and denies plaintiffs motion.
FACTS
The material facts of this case are not in dispute, and are summarized below. Plaintiff is a disappointed bidder for a Government contract with the Department of Defense.
I. Background
In May 1998, the Advanced Research Project Agency of the Department of Defense (DARPA) published and mailed a solicitation of proposals to over 50,000 small businesses, as part…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- John K. Rains v. Cascade Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Caddell Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Career Training Concepts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Hydro Engineering, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- CSE Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.