Legal Opinion

Georgia-Florida Motor Lines Inc. v. Slocumb

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 30, 1932No. 22026PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeoyees, C. J.

1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, the allowance of an amendment to a petition can not be the basis of a ground in a motion for a new trial. In order for the judgment allowing the amendment to be reviewed by this court, the bill of exceptions must contain a direct assignment of error upon that judgment.

2. The first part of special ground 2 of the motion for a new trial is merely an elaboration of the general grounds. The rest of the ground complains of the admission of certain evidence “over the timely objection of counsel for the defendant in error [plaintiff…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beavers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tifton Brick & Block Co. v. MeadowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. West Lumber Co. v. SchnuckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Holsenbeck v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. City of LaGrange v. PoundsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API