Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of A.C.N.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 1, 1998No. C8-97-2166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant A.C.N. challenges the district court’s certification order. Appellant argues the district court abused its discretion in ordering certification for the offense of aiding an offender after the fact in a homicide because: (1) the evidence did not establish probable cause to charge appellant with accessory after the fact in a homicide; (2) the district court erred in treating this as a presumptive certification because accessory after the fact crimes do not carry a presumptive prison sentence; and (3) public safety would be served by retaining appellant as an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. Lynette Burnette, United States of America v. Theresa Burnette, United States of America v. Michael Curtis BurnetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. State v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HagerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. State of Minnesota v. Adaiah Deontraie TownsendCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  3. State v. AndersonNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API