Legal Opinion

Employers Indemnity Corp. v. Garrett

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 21, 1931PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.

— Under the petition, this in form is a suit to foreclose a mortgage: in substance an action of.assumpsit brought by a mortgagee against the mortgagor’s grantee, based on a clause in the deed of conveyance whereby the latter purported to assume and agree to pay the mortgage debt. Through subsequent pleadings it developed into a suit in equity to reform the deed. The pertinent facts will be stated.

On the.first day of March, 1921, George Kaltenbach and Emma Kaltenbaeh, his wife, were the owners of a farm of 1,000 acres in Webster County, Missouri. The land was encumbered with two deeds of trust…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schmucker v. SibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Midland Railway Co. v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Heim v. VogelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  4. Dougherty v. DoughertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. Crone v. StindeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Commerce Trust Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Sheinbein v. First Boston Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Bank of Kirksville v. SmallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. Blackburn v. Habitat Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API