Legal Opinion

State v. Chapman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 13, 1996No. 221A95PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant’s only argument on appeal is that his confession should have been suppressed. He says this is so for several reasons. He first contends, relying on County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 114 L. Ed. 2d 49 (1991), and Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 43 L. Ed. 2d 54 (1975), that there was an unreasonable delay in having a magistrate determine whether there was probable cause for the issuance of an arrest warrant. These two cases deal with the promptness required for a determination of probable cause by a neutral magistrate after a person has been arrested…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. RookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Chavez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. State v. OwenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Riney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API