Legal Opinion
Joseph & Feldman v. Friedlander
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 28, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered September 8, 1995, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff law firm the principal sum of $52,922.02, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The factual determination that plaintiff law firm was entitled to judgment on the theory of an account stated, because defendants had failed to object to its bills within a reasonable time (see, Ruskin, Moscou, Evans & Faltischek v FGH Realty Credit Corp., 228 AD2d 294), was based upon the hearing court’s credibility findings and will not be disturbed (Thoreson v Penthouse Intl.,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Ruskin, Moscou, Evans & Faltischek, P. C. v. FGH Realty Credit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- Budgewood Laundry Service, Inc. v. Dorset Hotel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998