Legal Opinion

Feigelman v. Myers

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 26, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 9203PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that it is interlocutory in nature and therefore not within the jurisdiction of the court. The motion is opposed by appellants. We grant the motion to dismiss.

In Myers v. Feigelman, 455 F.2d 596, 59 CCPA 834 (1972), this court reversed the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences and remanded the case to the board for consideration of the suppression and concealment issue which had been properly before the board, but had not been resolved. Remand was “to allow the board to make a fully focused inquiry into this difficult…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Myers v. FeigelmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. Knickerbocker Toy Co. v. Faultless Starch Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goodbar v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. Aerco International, Inc. v. Vapor Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API