Legal Opinion
(HC) Murphy v. Moss
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 30, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01808Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TYRONE MURPHY, No. 2:19-cv-1808 JAM KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JOSEPH W. MOSS, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges his 2016 conviction. On November 19 15, 2019, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action on the grounds that the petition is not 20 fully exhausted. Petitioner did not file an opposition to the motion. On January 3,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Arthur Robbins, III v. Tom L. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Russell L. O'Bremski v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Raymond Edward Middleton v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.