Legal Opinion

United States v. Mel Lambert Velarde

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 1, 2007No. 06-2126PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.

Mel Velarde, who was convicted of sexually abusing a minor within Indian country, has filed a motion for a new trial under Rule 33(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. He claims that the government violated his rights under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), by suppressing evidence that L.V., the minor victim, falsely accused her school teacher and vice principal of inappropriate touching. Velarde argues that had the government disclosed this evidence, he could have impeached L.V. at trial, and the result of his trial would…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. Banks v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. MendezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API