Legal Opinion
Rosenblum v. Thomson Reuters (Markets) LLC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 25, 2013No. 13 Civ. 2219(SAS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Mark Rosenblum brings this action against his former employer, Thomson Reuters (“Thomson”) for violating Section 21F of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “34 Act”) as amended by The Dodd Frank Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6 et seq. (“The Dodd Frank Act” or “DFA”). Rosenblum seeks to recover damages “as a result of being retaliated against, harassed, and ultimately terminated as a result of his actions in a ‘protected activity’ as defined by The Dodd Frank Act.”1 Thomson now moves to dismiss the claim pursuant to Federal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Berman v. Neo@Ogilvy LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Yang v. Navigators Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Somers v. Digital Realty Trust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Bussing v. COR Clearing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2014
- Berman v. Neo@Ogilvy LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.