Legal Opinion

Ellsworth v. Shimer

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Demurrer to amended complaint for insufficiency.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

In Hutcheson v. Peck, 5 Johns. 196, 209, in an action of this character, viz., for alienating a wife’s affections, it was said that the quo animo is the material ■point,-and in Abbott’s Forms of Pleading this -case is cited as authority for the form of allegation there employed, viz., that the defendant wrongfully contrived and intended to injure the plaintiff. That the motive with which the defendant acted is all important in cases of this; kind is apparent also from the following decisions: Barnes v. Allen, 1 Keyes, 390, 394; Whitman v. Egbert, 27 App. Div. 374; Eldredge v. Eldredge, 79…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hutcheson v. PeckNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. Barnes v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. Whitman v. EgbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Madison v. NeuburgerNew York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API